期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Medical Research Frontier. 2022; 6: (2) ; 164-166 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.imrf.20220089.

Diagnostic value of clinical examination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children
小儿肺炎支原体感染临床检验的诊断价值分析

作者: 董风民 *

东明县胡庄卫生服务中心 山东菏泽

*通讯作者: 董风民,单位:东明县胡庄卫生服务中心 山东菏泽;

发布时间: 2022-07-29 总浏览量: 370

摘要

目的 分析小儿肺炎支原体感染患儿接受临床检验的相关作用。方法 从2020年1月-2022年1月区间内因小儿肺炎入院接受诊治的患儿内随机选择100例研究,对整体患儿实施回顾性分析,分析患儿的临床检验结果。结果 100例患儿内,经过MP-IgM检测结果发现,MP-IgM阳性人数为37例,检出率为37%。37例患儿内,上呼吸道感染的患儿为14例,支气管炎的患儿为10例,支气管肺炎的人数为6例,支气管哮喘的为4例。痰液检查阳性的患儿人数为23例,检出率为23%,其中肺炎链球菌为11例,肺炎克雷伯菌为8例,阴沟肠杆菌为4例。男性患儿MP-IgM检出率为45.95%,女性患儿MP-IgM检出率为54.05%,女性稍高于男性,但对比无显著差异,P>0.05。结论 小儿肺炎支原体感染后接受临床检验,可以为临床工作提供部分参考,但最终的检查仍需结合其他数据。

关键词: 小儿肺炎;支原体感染;临床检验;诊断价值

Abstract

Objective to analyze the related role of clinical examination in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.
Methods from January 2020 to January 2022, 100 children with pediatric pneumonia were randomly selected for study. The whole children were analyzed retrospectively and the clinical test results were analyzed.
Results in 100 children, the detection results of MP IgM showed that 37 cases were MP IgM positive, and the detection rate was 37%. Among the 37 children, there were 14 children with upper respiratory tract infection, 10 children with bronchitis, 6 children with bronchopneumonia and 4 children with bronchial asthma. The number of children with positive sputum test was 23, and the detection rate was 23%, including 11 cases of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 8 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 cases of Enterobacter cloacae. The detection rate of MP IgM in male children was 45.95%, and that in female children was 54.05%. Women were slightly higher than men, but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05).
Conclusion   clinical examination after Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children can provide some reference for clinical work, but the final examination still needs to be combined with other data.

Key words: Pediatric pneumonia; Mycoplasma infection; Clinical examination; Diagnostic value

参考文献 References

[1] 邓玉林,梁樑. 小儿肺炎支原体感染临床检验的诊断价值探讨[J]. 质量安全与检验检测,2021,31(06):87-89+94.

[2] 花玉琳. 小儿肺炎支原体感染的临床检验技术[J]. 黑龙江中医药,2021,50(05):15-16.

[3] 熊熙,游美红,聂仕娇. 小儿肺炎支原体感染临床检验的诊断价值[J]. 医疗装备,2021,34(12):29-30.

[4] 张宏. 探析临床检验在诊断小儿肺炎支原体感染中的应用价值[J]. 中外医疗,2020,39(24):171-173.

[5] 陈正荣, 严永东. 小儿肺炎支原体感染流行病学特征[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2015, 30(3):4.

[6] 张桂华. 个性化护理干预对小儿肺炎支原体感染的疗效影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2015, 13(26):1.

[7] 吕云香, 林咏梅. 小儿肺炎支原体感染52例临床检验分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2015, 13(16):1.

[8] 李文松, 韩玲芝, 李玉洋,等. 小儿肺炎支原体感染的临床特点及其危险因素分析[J]. 医药卫生(文摘版), 2022(25).

[9] 黄敏. 小儿肺炎支原体感染120例临床检验分析[J]. 医药前沿, 2017(27).

[10] 黄东明, 刘学明, 王月玲. 126例小儿肺炎支原体感染情况及干预措施分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(21):3.

[11] 吕保芳. 300例小儿肺炎支原体感染临床检验分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2017, 14(A01):2.

[12] 姬华. 个性化护理在小儿肺炎支原体感染中的效果观察[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2016, 3(32):2.

[13] 胡兴敏, 熊雄, 刘书娅. 小儿肺炎支原体感染与支气管哮喘的相关性分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015.

[14] 杜巍. 小儿肺炎支原体感染行快速血清学检验与微生物培养检测的价值比较[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2016.

[15] 刘晓宇, 王丹丹, 张静平,等. 常规联合布地奈德治疗小儿肺炎支原体感染后咳嗽疗效观察[J]. 人民军医, 2015, 58(1):2.

[16] 徐艳娜. 小儿肺热咳喘口服液联合阿奇霉素注射液治疗小儿肺炎支原体感染25例[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育, 2016(13):2.


引用本文

董风民, 小儿肺炎支原体感染临床检验的诊断价值分析[J]. 国际医药研究前沿, 2022; 6: (2) : 164-166.