Observation on the effect of fracture rehabilitation therapy on the incidence of joint complicationsin patients after fracture operation
骨折康复治疗对骨折术后病人关节并发症发生率的影响观察

摘要

目的 研究骨折术后患者治疗过程中骨折康复治疗的作用，并分析其对患者关节并发症发生率的影响。方法 本次实验跨越2019年8月至2022年1月这一时间段，研究人员对90例骨折术后患者进行研究。研究人员按照双盲对照原则对本次实验研究对象进行分组，对照组所选45例患者实施常规治疗，实验组所选45例患者实施骨科康复治疗，记录对照组及实验组所选患者关节并发症出现情况、治疗总有效率，并进行分析比较。结果 对照组所选45例患者中出现关节并发症的人数共计12人，占比为26.67%，实验组所选45例患者中共计3人出现关节并发症，占组内所选患者总人数的比例为6.67%，比较分析组间患者关节并发症出现概率相关数据，有着较大的差距，（p＜0.05）；对照组所选45例患者中治疗效果突出及治疗效果一般的人数共计32人，实验组对应人数为43人，占比分别为71.11%及95.56%，比较分析组间相关数据，差异较大，（p＜0.05）。结论 在骨折术后患者治疗过程中骨折康复治疗有着不俗的表现，其对患者病情治疗效果及关节并发症出现概率的影响不容忽视。

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of fracture rehabilitation in the treatment of patients after fracture surgery, and to analyze its influence on the incidence of joint complications in patients.
Methods This experiment spanned the time period from August 2019 to January 2022, and the researchers studied 90 patients after fracture surgery. The researchers divided the subjects of this experiment into groups according to the principle of double-blind control. 45 patients in the control group received conventional treatment, and 45 patients in the experimental group received orthopaedic rehabilitation therapy. The joint complications of the control group and the selected patients in the experimental group were recorded. The occurrence of symptoms and the total effective rate of treatment were analyzed and compared.
Results There were 12 patients with joint complications among the 45 patients selected in the control group, accounting for 26.67%, and a total of 3 patients with joint complications among the 45 patients selected in the experimental group, accounting for the total number of patients in the group. The proportion of patients in the control group was 6.67%, and there was a large gap in the data related to the occurrence probability of joint complications between the groups (p < 0.05). Among the 45 patients selected in the control group, there were 32 patients with outstanding treatment effects and average treatment effects. There were 43 people in the experimental group, accounting for 71.11% and 95.56%, respectively. The correlation data between the groups were compared and analyzed, and the difference was large (p<0.05).
Conclusion   Fracture rehabilitation has a good performance in the treatment of patients after fracture, and its influence on the treatment effect of patients and the probability of joint complications cannot be ignored.