Effect analysis of evidence-based nursing in acute myocardial infarction Nursing
急性心肌梗死护理中应用循证护理的效果分析

摘要

目的 探究对急性心肌梗死患者使用循证护理的干预效果。方法 选取我院在2020年10月至2021年10月在我院就诊的急性心肌梗死患者，根据就诊时间选取前100例患者进行观察研究。使用随机表数法将患者等分为两组，即对照组和观察组，对照组患者使用常规护理方法，观察组使用循证护理干预，对比两组患者使用护理干预后的并发症发生率、患者对护理的满意度评分、SAS（焦虑自评量表）评分、SDS（抑郁自评量表）评分、护理总有效率以及生活质量评分。结果 观察组患者满意度评分、生活质量评分、护理总有效率均高于对照组（P＜0.05），并发症发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05），观察组患者护理后SAS评分、SAS评分均比对照组低（P＜0.05）。结论 循证护理相比常规护理更能提高患者的生活质量，减轻患者的不良情绪，降低并发症发生率，从而提高患者对护理的满意度评分，值得在临床上推广和使用。

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of evidence-based nursing intervention on patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Methods select the patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in our hospital from October 2020 to October 2021, and select the first 100 patients according to the treatment time for observation and research. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, namely, the control group and the observation group. The patients in the control group used routine nursing methods and the observation group used evidence-based nursing intervention. The incidence of complications, patients' satisfaction with nursing, SAS (self rating Anxiety Scale), SDS (self rating Depression Scale), total effective rate of nursing and quality of life were compared between the two groups.
Results The patients' satisfaction score, quality of life score, and total nursing effective rate in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : compared with routine nursing, evidence-based nursing can improve the quality of life of patients, reduce their bad mood, reduce the incidence of complications, and thus improve their satisfaction with nursing. It is worth popularizing and using in clinical practice.